He makes these predictions in this interview:
pull down to refresh
88 sats \ 0 replies \ @ken 20 Apr
Vast majority of Schmidts will be replaced by AI
reply
302 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr 20 Apr
Elon has made similar predictions about driverless cars for 11-12 years now, and the lesson I've learned in watching these predictions unfold is that the edge cases are really hard.
I wonder if the same thing happens with programming. It's easy for AI to generate standard templates using well understood languages, but how do you effectively prompt it to build something new?
reply
125 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 19 Apr
Not sure about the real programming world, but for sure not in the academic programming one. Admittedly, it's maybe not the same, as the coding is just the tool and not the end goal. The AI is probably a net positive for the physicists who were already good. I'm now using algorithms of CS that i never thought of using, getting to the final objective faster and using a straighter road, but I don't see the AI actually getting there by itself. Let's see what the future brings. I still see it struggling too much with actual reasoning. I don't like to call it reasoning yet as that's not what it is actually doing under the hood. Anyhow. Let's see~~
How long before you think you can tell the AI: go through all the issues on my GitHub project and propose PRs for each one. Make sure to follow the conventions from our codebase and follow the style from @ek and myself. We won't have time to review it so ask the other AI agent to take care of it.
reply
198 sats \ 2 replies \ @franzap 20 Apr
Is there a "remind me in one year" bot here on SN? So we can all laugh at how his silly prediction did not materialize?
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 20 Apr
Yep @remindme
Rules are in the bio
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @franzap 20 Apr
@remindme in 1 year
reply
33 sats \ 2 replies \ @BlokchainB 19 Apr
So does this mean k00b no longer have to do pull requests and @ek can stop reminding me to push code every day?
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 20 Apr
I see, you’re not remembering your dreams
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 20 Apr
I do. Just life gets in the way
reply
33 sats \ 4 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 19 Apr
Doubt
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 20 Apr
In many ways predictions are just people saying aloud what they want to happen.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 20 Apr
Because they have nothing to lose
Nobody is going to remember or care if they were wrong but if they turn out to be right, everybody is going to think they are a genius
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 20 Apr
I think you’re absolutely correct. I have no context on the speaker in the video.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 20 Apr
Used to be CEO of Google
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @SpaceHodler 20 Apr
The AI used for coding would really have to be self-hostable to protect the privacy of the code being generated.
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @JesseJames 20 Apr
Bold statement to get likes? lol
Not in a 5-10 years until we get to real AGI, AI is no intelligence, it is a prediction utility, no better than your stock market guy... Does it help? Hell yeah, but to replace people? no way Jose, not in a loong time.
reply
16 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 19 Apr
That's a bold claim.
reply
100 sats \ 14 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 19 Apr
A bold claim indeed @OT, but I won't be surprised if the programming world gets @k00b and replaced with AI, even in @south_korea_ln AI is already taking over and it's best no one doubts it cos @WeAreAllSatoshi and with Satoshi, everything is possible.
reply
120 sats \ 13 replies \ @OT 19 Apr
This reply is exactly why AI is unlikely to replace the vast majority of programmers in the next few years.
reply
0 sats \ 12 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 20 Apr
Lol... thanks
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 20 Apr
@k00b Now I think you're been rude and irrational
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @OT 20 Apr
Oh, you're not a bot?
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b OP 20 Apr
Just a scammer
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @Lazy_AMA 20 Apr
Drop the scam proof here, so we'd all see
view all 8 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 20 Apr
I see that Schmidt is going after old catchphrases to promote his book.
reply