pull down to refresh

I am pretty sure drawing swastika graffiti on a synagogue is a hate crime in most jurisdictions. How about this hypothetical: Someone graffitis a prominent Israeli politician's car with swastika graffiti, and the defendant argues the message was an intent to compare the politician to a Nazi for annexing foreign territory and engaging in ethnic cleansing?
That's just one reason hate crimes are dumb.
I guess I've misunderstood. I really thought actual hate crimes were violent crimes against people. I thought the rest was media and rhetoric, with actual charges being property damage.
reply