pull down to refresh

This article points out how ridiculous hate crime laws are. I can't imagine the New York Times arguing in support of swastikas in any other context.
As a very young kid I remember classmates drawing nazi symbols on their notebooks. I doubt anyone knew the connotations. They were just fun to draw.
reply
I thought hate crime had to be against a physical person.
reply
I am pretty sure drawing swastika graffiti on a synagogue is a hate crime in most jurisdictions. How about this hypothetical: Someone graffitis a prominent Israeli politician's car with swastika graffiti, and the defendant argues the message was an intent to compare the politician to a Nazi for annexing foreign territory and engaging in ethnic cleansing?
That's just one reason hate crimes are dumb.
reply
I guess I've misunderstood. I really thought actual hate crimes were violent crimes against people. I thought the rest was media and rhetoric, with actual charges being property damage.
reply