pull down to refresh
Namely with Ark.
Ark without LN is totally horseshit. It have no use case without LN.
Please explain.
Well you came to the right place. We are working on doing exactly that - combining Ark with LN 🔥
In other words... FUCK BOLTZ.
That is for clueless normies that eat all the shit they see...
Please explain.
Ark without LN is FUCKED.
Stop living in a dream... So "selling"· Ark as alternative to LN is really dumb and misleading
You didn't even get the meme
I got it. I just wanted to add more stuff to my previous comment.
You told me my humor is so weird not even I get it, remember? So how can you be sure you got it? lol
your humor is not humor.
is just...
no, my humor is this:
What is Ark? I'm a newbie and try to avoid anything bad about BTC, but I like to check, learn about it, before avoiding it.
Ark is not a "bad" thing for BTC. But also doesn't fix things or scale more.
IMHO we already have tools that are not 100% used... but people like to divert noobs attention to things that are incentives for their own business model.
Always keep in mind this:
I understand. In a way, I have been skeptical about proposals from companies that don't seem focused on the core of bitcoin. Thanks for responding.
Why would Ark be without LN? Ark server becomes your LN custodial wallet and will pay your invoices. The only difference from Cashus is that you can unilateraly exit to onchain.
Boltz will implement the shitcoin Tether...
@remindme in 1 year
We don't offer swaps involving Tether and with regards to Liquid's L-BTC, well it simply enables use cases that are not possible with onchain Bitcoin. But we see your point that Liquid doesn't have the same properties as Lightning as it's not featuring unilateral exit.
We can certainly explore ways to help users understand trade-offs better, similar to how https://www.bitcoinlayers.org does.
Also, the new layers we are working on do feature unilateral exit and we are very excited about the use cases one can build with it. Namely with Ark.