pull down to refresh

Recently President Trump threatened to invade Mexico—all in its best interest, of course—in order to smash the drug cartels that are responsible for funneling so many illegal drugs into the US. There is no doubt that the drug cartels are wealthy and vicious criminals. Apparently they have taken over major towns and provinces in Mexico and have assassinated local officials and anyone else trying to curb their “trade.” Is there any alternative to stopping the violence except escalation even to the level of invading a sovereign nation? Yes, there is: Legalize drugs and end the so-called “War on Drugs.”
Note the use of the word “personal” choice. We may personally decide to support someone who harms himself in any number of ways, including taking drugs, but no one may force “society” to accept this responsibility through taxes which, one must remember, are enforced at the point of a gun. In addition to welfare dependency, this prohibition on taxpayer funding should include rehabs centers and the like.
Freedom goes both ways. The individual has the freedom to take any risk he chooses as long as he harms no one else in the process. But the rest of society must be free from funding the consequences of the freedom of the individual to take personal risk. Legalize drugs and end public welfare for those who harm themselves by partaking in the drug culture.
The crux of the matter is personal choice and personal responsibility for making those choices. You and you alone are responsible for yourself and whatever choice you make and should not have someone else, with a gun, force others to support you. Go ahead and do what you will, but leave me out of it.
Freedom goes both ways. The individual has the freedom to take any risk he chooses as long as he harms no one else in the process. But the rest of society must be free from funding the consequences of the freedom of the individual to take personal risk. Legalize drugs and end public welfare for those who harm themselves by partaking in the drug culture.
The problem here is that society can't credibly commit to letting people suffer the consequences of their actions.
reply
We could. It is just like being able to stop crime when you are armed. It stops crime but there is the possibility of a mistake, so what do you do? You make the choice and suffer the consequences. Shooting up should be the same.
reply
There will always be people who are gonna vote for public funding to help people who are suffering, even if their suffering is totally the result of their own actions
reply
Then you understand the problem is with those willing to have their agents point weapons at other people and steal from them, right? They couldn’t do it themselves, so, they get together and appoint an agent to work for them while giving the agent powers they did not have in the first place to give their appointed goons.
reply
Yes, indeed. But of course they're not gonna see it that way. Too few people think about the nature of taxes and public spending.
reply
Well, you can’t blame them if they have had their brains fully washed in the indoctrination centers for 12-13 years straight, not to speak of the extra 4-5 years of extra special brainwashing in post-secondary indoctrination. It has become a habit for them not to think, only accept authoritah.