pull down to refresh
149 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Mar \ on: Matthew Kratter's Bitcoin University Pushing Pro-Kremlin Propaganda. Why? bitcoin
Wanting a war to continue until it ends on your terms is the same as wanting it to continue, when the terms you want are unattainable.
Likely, you disagree about the plausibility of a more favorable ending for the Ukrainians, but many Americans expect nothing more than death and destruction from this conflict, with the end result being the same or worse than it would have been a few years ago when Boris Johnson blew up the peace agreement.
Also, Putin was certainly not justified in invading Ukraine, but acting like NATO was just minded its own business and then Russia invaded out of nowhere is completely inaccurate. They knew they were provoking Russia with repeated NATO expansions and that the odds of this sort of conflict was increasing.
You should at least be able to understand where we're coming from. The "pro-Kremlin" charge is about as tired as calling everyone Nazis.
I do appreciate where you push back on Kratter's inaccuracies in describing the "unused savings" thing. I certainly hadn't been following that closely and assumed it was essentially a bail-in.
If it were really a "bail-in" it would, and should be all over the news. But that isn't happening.
Instead Europe is spending a lot of money to stimulate their economies which is understandable how slow their growth has been. Look at how much the US spends?
As far as the Russia-Ukraine issue.... I am not an expert and I don't have all the facts. However I hear nothing but anti-Ukraine sentiment coming from Twitter, and either no criticism of Russia (who bombs Ukrainian cities continually) or a pro-Russia take which... for the life of me I don't understand.
I'm not 'pro-Ukraine' I'm not pro-anybody. But I have watched hours of combat footage from the war, and the Ukrainians fight really hard, on their own land, and their cities have been bombed by the Russians... for like 3 years.
Why Mr Trump doesn't ask for concessions from Mr. Putin is beyond me. And Mr. Kratter's video is totally anti-EU... without telling the whole story in my opinion.
If Mr Trump had been serious about negotiations (with Russia) he would have started 'from a position of strength' like he always does... asking "too much" to then back off, compromise, and finally "make a deal." But he didn't do it this way at all and I don't understand it. Now the cease fire the Russians won't sign... and there is practically zero leverage against them.
Being Pro-Trump doesn't mean leaving your brain behind
reply
There's definitely a major incongruity with how stuff is covered. It's a good question why there isn't more coverage of Russian atrocities, like there is for Israel's (for instance).
My best guess is that people are pushing back against the corporate press narrative, like you said, and not being careful enough about what they're actually consuming.
From what I can tell, the EU is earning it's new status as a villain, by consistently doing the wrong thing. Of course, I'm open to that being my own media bubble speaking.
reply
The EU is painfully behind both the US and China in funding, capital creation, innovation, and technology and it shows. And i'm not a fan of how 'restrictive' the EU is on some things (like encryption) or kyc/non-kyc and they will only fall further behind because of it.
However I don't think the EU is evil.
At the end of the day people vote with their feet, and more and more folks will wind up in the US because it's the biggest market with the most opportunity.
I'm open to how anything is covered... but I don't accept Twitter as a source of news generally it is filled with nonsense
reply
I don't accept Twitter as a source of news
That's a good policy and it's good to be on guard against people who are essentially just laundering unreliable Twitter news.
reply
Twitter could be a great source of information, especially if it could tie in to other sources - newspapers, documentaries, educational programs, government, non-government...
But that's not the case currently. Since Elon bought Twitter the bot problem and spam problems have only become much, much worse and the whole platform is highly politicized.
reply
Why Mr Trump doesn't ask for concessions from Mr. Putin is beyond me. And Mr. Kratter's video is totally anti-EU... without telling the whole story in my opinion. If Mr Trump had been serious about negotiations (with Russia) he would have started 'from a position of strength' like he always does... asking "too much" to then back off, compromise, and finally "make a deal." But he didn't do it this way at all and I don't understand it. Now the cease fire the Russians won't sign... and there is practically zero leverage against them.
I think Russia is de factor winning the war, and they are rightfully dictating the terms of the settlement. There is nothing Trump can do about it, he doesn't have much leverage, and he knows it (I think). Also, I think Russia agreed on a cease-fire, but on their terms.
What I'm hearing from certain sources is that Ukraine has forgone many opportunities to end the conflict in more favourable terms for them (Minsk agreements, and later on, Istanbul agreement). Had Zelensky agreed to implement the Minsk agreements as promised during his presidential campaign, there would have been no war, and they would still own the Crimean peninsula. Also, walking away from the Istanbul negotiations three weeks after the beginning of the conflict has costed them millions of lives and 20% of their territory. In hindsight, we recognise that all this could have easily been avoided, and here is, in my opinion, where some of the anti-eu sentiment is coming from...
reply
Wanting a war to continue until it ends on your terms is the same as wanting it to continue, when the terms you want are unattainable.
Yes. It seems for many the only viable position is support war in Ukraine until Putin is no longer in power. Supporting Putin is anything but full support for Ukraine until they win. Its crazy.
reply