pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 5h \ parent \ on: 2025 March Madness Contest- Crowdsourcing Ideas Stacker_Sports
We definitely had more players eliminated early than I expected or hoped for last year. Not sure if that was due to anomaly (there were a lot of unexpected upsets) or the contest format. Good point though that keeping people involved throughout is much better. I will have to think about how we can achieve that.
write
preview
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @kurszusz 5h
An other idea....idk if this will be OK, or it's against the rules / the principles... What if...after a player was eliminated, he/she have the possibility to "rebuy" their membership for a symbolic amount of sats (except the final)...the number of rebuy's can be from 1 to unlimited (it depend how will be decided). And the sats from rebuy to go to the prize pool... It's just a suggestion, but maybee works.
OR...
To keep as much players involved it's possible to use a point system. In case of wrong prediction players will be not eliminated, but get 0 points for that prediction...
What do you think?
reply