pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 27 Feb \ on: Jack Dorsey is not Satoshi Nakamoto bitcoin_beginners
The idea that Satoshi was an individual is a fairytale for innocent minds, but something ironic in this post is highlighting this tweet:
We know Jack is/was a spook given the twitter revelations (white or black hat is in the eye of the beholder)
Spooks posting particular numbers like these aren't just happenstance, they're comms to be decoded by someone/group... akin to steganography
He's done this often, conveniently I can't get receipts on one of his more infamous coded tweets:
These are "Q" posts are from 2018, seemingly the seizure of Twitter was revealed years after it actually happened:
So while Jack is unlikely to be part of the Satoshi operation, he obviously knows things the public doesn't given his station in important organizations and shadowy persona.
So, the question remains whether his actions in Bitcoin are rational self-interest? altruistic? or is obeying orders?