Jack Dorsey is not Satoshi Nakamoto \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

Jack Dorsey is not Satoshi Nakamoto blog.lopp.net/jack-dorsey-is-not-satoshi-nakamoto

1184 sats \ 9 comments \ @Roll 27 Feb bitcoin_beginners

I highly believe that he's someone who has never been speculated. All these names for Satoshi Nakamoto are just to create buzz.

36 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 27 Feb

Its so absurd really. Dude did numerology as a part of his "theory". Its just far to easy to get attention by speculating and so many people are weak in logical faculties to be skeptical.

The TLDR;

A Little Common Sense

During the time period of 2009 & 2010, Jack Dorsey was not only Chairman of the Board of Twitter, but also the CEO of the fledgling startup Square. It's quite clear that he was an extremely busy person not only overseeing multiple companies, but traveling around the world meeting important people, doing press interviews, speaking at conferences, promoting philanthropic causes, and more.

His activities do not fit the profile of someone who had the time and mental bandwidth to also be building a completely new financial system from scratch while maintaining perfect anonymit

26 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 27 Feb

It is better for Bitcoin that Satoshi not be a man, for men are fallible, fickle, and fragile. Satoshi is an idea; it is better that all who contribute to Bitcoin be an embodiment of that idea. As such, I pose to you that it is to the benefit of Bitcoin that we crush any myths of Satoshi’s true identity.

Also pretty vicious takedown ...perhaps once or twice Dorsey managed this Clark Kent-type endeavor... But dozens of times? Uh-hu

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 27 Feb

The idea that Satoshi was an individual is a fairytale for innocent minds, but something ironic in this post is highlighting this tweet:

We know Jack is/was a spook given the twitter revelations (white or black hat is in the eye of the beholder)

Spooks posting particular numbers like these aren't just happenstance, they're comms to be decoded by someone/group... akin to steganography

He's done this often, conveniently I can't get receipts on one of his more infamous coded tweets:

These are "Q" posts are from 2018, seemingly the seizure of Twitter was revealed years after it actually happened:

So while Jack is unlikely to be part of the Satoshi operation, he obviously knows things the public doesn't given his station in important organizations and shadowy persona.

So, the question remains whether his actions in Bitcoin are rational self-interest? altruistic? or is obeying orders?

7 sats \ 1 reply \ @030e0dca83 27 Feb

He is, because we all are Satoshi So, he's too

7 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 27 Feb

Yes we are

7 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 27 Feb

Interestingly I just deep research query to look into the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Jack didn't make the list of top 20 suspects...

https://chatgpt.com/c/67beb1b4-5e94-8000-9b5d-e0bb9a6bd00c

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @guts 27 Feb

Neither Adam Back

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @scuffed 27 Feb