pull down to refresh
Yes, we can do that easily enough. It ignores our zappers, though, but we shouldn't make the perfect the enemy of the good.
That's why I said manually. With that I meant we can assign the point to multiple or more points based on a specific criteria.
- The best post overall gets 2 points.
- The second best gets 1 point.
- The best comment gets 2 points.
- The second best gets 1 point.
We can also have multiple winners.
What amount of sats do you think would be a good amount for monthly reward?
We should initially start it at something like 5k-10k. Long-term, it should be a fraction of monthly profits. That's similar to what @siggy47's doing with his ~bitcoin_beginners rewards.
deleted by author
Sounds good to me.
deleted by author
I approve of any and all experiments.
deleted by author
When will Workit be available on Android?
In a couple more months.
I think we could do a low stakes competition, based on your accountability posts. Using your super scientific points system, we could award 1k to whoever had the best month. That should be a light enough reward that people don't cheat to get it.
deleted by author
Sorry for the late reply. It was late at night last day.
Can we not do it manually by assigning points to top contributors daily?
The top post gets the +1 point
The top comment gets +1 point
At the end of the month, the Stacker who has the most points wins the reward.
It requires a little effort of keeping record though.