pull down to refresh

Fantastic opening:
An odd thing happened when Coinbase reported its quarterly financial results last week. The bulk of its assets and liabilities abruptly disappeared. The cryptocurrency exchange had shown $291 billion of assets as of Sept. 30. At year-end, they were $23 billion. Total liabilities, once $282 billion a few months earlier, dropped to $12 billion.
The legality of who owns bitcoin custodied with Coinbase (well--HELLO MicroStrategy!) remains unclear:
The off-balance-sheet treatment suggests the customers do, rather than Coinbase. But Coinbase in its latest disclosures to investors still says the issue isn’t clearly resolved. If Coinbase went bankrupt, the bitcoins and other tokens held on behalf of customers could be considered the property of the bankruptcy estate, and such customers could be treated as unsecured creditors. After some crypto trading platforms failed in 2022 and 2023, bankruptcy judges indeed ruled that many of the customers were unsecured creditors and that the crypto assets being stored belonged to the companies’ bankruptcy estates.
This is funny: I guess... oops??
Providing custodial services for crypto assets involves maintaining the cryptographic keys needed to access them. In that respect, crypto assets have similarities to bearer shares, where whoever possesses them essentially owns them.
Because of prior capital rules (and extra rules that punished crypto), banks were very uninterested in custodying bitcoin... now, though, after the SEC SAB 121-ruling, that could change
The rescission of SAB 121 could attract more competition from banks and broker-dealers, although they would need approval from other regulators. Some already have a head-start. Bank of New York Mellon was among the financial institutions that received exemptions from SAB 121 last year, after the SEC determined their services for safeguarding crypto assets would provide the same protection as their custodial services for other assets.
It's funny the ways that bitcoin clashes with the legacy world.
Edit: meant to include this _VICIOUS Vijay tweet too:

Archive gave me a nonpaywalled link but only seems to be work-in-progress. Check it https://archive.md/wip/QJjfb
if you can't read it... I guess, there's nothing I can do.
The cryptocurrency exchange had shown $291 billion of assets as of Sept. 30. At year-end, they were $23 billion. Total liabilities, once $282 billion a few months earlier, dropped to $12 billion.
Did Coinbase cleared its liabilities with the assets? I'm not sure they can do it, nor do I understand clearly the economics behind it. It's my general assumption.
reply
No they moved customers' funds off balance sheet, to at least in an accounting sense show that they don't belong to Coinbase
reply
32 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 21 Feb
I love that tweet from Vijay! It sums of my feeling perfectly about Brian.
In 100 years people will look at him as one of the dumbest people on the planet. He really is stupider than a no-coiner....
I suspect that Coinbase is going to get bought out once the SAB-121 repeal kicks in, but I honestly wish someone like Fidelity would drive them into bankruptcy.
reply
Fingers crossssssed
reply
I don't see how they can treat custodied coins as anything other than property of the custodian. In the event of a bankruptcy, they just have to divvy everything up to make people as whole as possible, with what's leftover.
It seems like the alternative would be to pay out on a first-come first-serve basis and then prosecute the custodian for theft of the missing coins.
reply
Not your keys not your coins
Can’t believe PlanB gave up self custody for ETF IOUs
reply
It's because SAB 121 rescinding, see kpmg report
Importantly, SAB 122 does not change the requirement for entities holding or otherwise safeguarding digital assets for others to evaluate whether they control those digital assets. In such cases, the entity is deemed the “accounting owner” of the digital assets and would be required to recognize the digital assets and a liability reflecting its obligation to return those digital assets to their legal owner on its balance sheet. Sections 3.2.60 and 4.3.10 of our Issues in Depth, Accounting and reporting for crypto intangible assets, provide guidance.
From SAB 121:
Accordingly, as long as Entity A is responsible for safeguarding the crypto-assets held for its platform users, including maintaining the cryptographic key information necessary to access the crypto-assets, the staff believes that Entity A should present a liability on its balance sheet to reflect its obligation to safeguard the crypto-assets held for its platform users.
reply
awesome! Thanks for clarifying
reply
forgot to mention this just means we're back to "cook the books" pre 2022.
reply
Why do people insist on leaving bitcoin on exchanges?
reply
IMO, it should be treated as on balance sheet, but not that it matters much to me because I'd never keep a significant amount on a custodial exchange anyway.
reply
Isnt this similar to how mtgox got to force hodl bitcoin for people for so long? People need to realize you can buy your bitcoin elsewhere. Seems a bit off that they would claim other peoples assets as their own. At this point, havent they sold most of their bitcoin? The next scam that will be coming is the paper bitcoin scandal.
reply