pull down to refresh

The point is more that California's problems are California's own doing, not the parent entity they constantly need help from and to whom their largest business are fleeing for. So secession doesn't address anything, it doubles down on the problem: California.
If this article had a point to make, other than there's still a sect of small government libertarians that are addicted to losing and looking retarded, it would be reversed:
The US should deny all funding to California and remove its federal seats from office until it such time that holds new elections meeting federal standards for security. This is whats more likely to happen.
Since I think secession is very unlikely, I probably agree. However, that also seems very unlikely.
reply
Trump already floated basically that, narrative seeding... I think some version of it is more likely than not. However it plays out the end result is i'm willing to wager sats that Nicole Shanhan has already been selected as the next CA governor.
reply
Do you have a timeline in mind for that?
I'd take you up on a small friendly wager.
It's a win-win for me, either I get some sats or CA becomes a less horrible place.
reply
Looks like ya'll got a gubernatorial in '26, the timing of that couldn't be more perfect.
50k sats that she (or someone she's strongly endorsing) wins that? should buy a nice dinner by then
reply
Too rich for my blood.
I'd take 10k on those terms, though.
reply
Sounds good, if she does win and corn does what it's supposed to maybe I can pay you in person when I'm shopping for beachfront in La Jolla