pull down to refresh

  1. Will try to investigate from where is coming and why they send it to me
  2. If it was a mistake, I will return it back, but they will have to provide me proof that was a mistake and they are real owners of the tx
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @NovaRift 11h
You're a very honest man. đź‘Ź
reply
Because I respect and follow the natural law. Under natural law you must be honest.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @NovaRift 11h
I've read it several times
do not steal from other man
reply
yep, so simple. If many other people will just follow the natural law, this world will not be so fucked up
reply
Ignoring the reality that since the emergence of life it has been a ruthless competition for energy and resources. This is how life works. There is no natural law imposing property 'rights' preventing theft- 'theft' is simply claiming ownership and any study of life and evolution shows this.
IT IS ONLY WHEN HUMANS institute GOVERNMENTS and the rules and regulations they impose that ownership 'rights' alleged.
@Darthcoin and Libertarians generally completely fail to understand that in nature there are no ownership 'rights' above the ability to seize the property from others. Only governments can impose the artificial notion of ownership 'rights'.
The is no 'Natural Law' alleging property rights.
Libertarians don't realise how confused and woke they are sometimes.
reply
yep, so simple
Yea, it really is.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 8h
What if it comes from Blackrock or similar type of banksters? (I'm interested in where you draw the line)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 9h
Best answer
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @Taft 10h
but they will have to provide me proof that was a mistake and they are real owners of the tx
If they don't provide the proof, what would you do?
reply
reply
10 sats \ 6 replies \ @Taft 10h
Oh, I didn't see that. This is a noble act on your part.
reply
I don't see it as "noble". more like the right thing to do. When you have a certain level of morality (in society), you know very well the differences between right and wrong.
reply
If someone is careless enough to send their sats to your wallet they do not deserve to keep them.
There is no right to ownership above the requirement to secure your own property.
It is only governments which impose this artificial man made concept of ownership 'rights'.
Darthcoin is here effectively preaching the 'need' for governments to impose and enforce property rights, without perhaps even realising it.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Taft 10h
I would agree with you if we lived in a world where evil didn’t exist. But in the world we do live in, such an action seems more like a noble deed rather than just the right thing to do. It truly is the right thing to do, but few people manage to do it, which is why I see it as something deeply noble.
reply
If more people will study and understand the true meaning of Natural Law then we will have a better place. I am not saying that bad people will cease to exist. But we can limit their powers, especially when they have great power over masses (aka politicians).
Assume it wasn't a mistake and it was for no reason at all. What then?
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 11h
If was a mysterious donation, I would try to help others to onboard to Bitcoin. Put them into a LN bank and offer 0 fees accounts to many poor users that cannot afford a decent UTXO.
reply
Sounds like socialism.
reply