I was talking to my younger sister on the phone a while back and we were discussing the differences between myself, her, and my older brother. She came to the conclusion that my older brother would paddle up stream to get to his destination but he would get there, while she would just go with the flow and eventually get there. I of course, would take the bridge, get there first, and ask them why they were wet.
I have always been lazy and will always be lazy, which may be surprising given my post history. If I'm not interested in something, I'm not getting off the couch (apologies to my wife).
However, when I am interested in something, I tend to ALWAYS search for the path of least resistance. When it came to weightlifting, for instance, I obsessively learned everything that I possibly could. The goal, was always how do I effectively find the most efficient use of my energy to get the maximum benefit. I'm not interested in investing a year into something that can be done in 11 months and 3 weeks.
Due to the nature of my job, I don't have set hours, I work until the job is done. So if I can find a way to take 3 seconds off a process that I do 20 times a day I just gained over 4 hours of free time in a year. This is literally how I think about things that I am forced to do, when I'd rather be doing anything else.
I guess the point I'm getting at is that negative traits don't always have to be negative. Am I lazy? Or am I a free time maximalist? A coin has two sides.
I've said it once and I'll say it again: Lazy people are mostly very efficient people.