pull down to refresh

Thanks for taking the effort to look into it. You may want to seek different sources than the ones you used, though. There are a lot of sources better than the mouthpiece of the CIA: CNNLOL, but even they had to admit to the truth, at least this once.
reply
That's true, but at the same time, it's worth knowing how much is not even disputed by the intentional propagandists.
reply
Yes, you could say, then, that this is an indisputable fact, right? Except, there is someone out there that will dispute it because their hero, Just didn’t do that kind of thing!!!!! I have to say, it, along with other evidence of other things he said and did, doesn’t paint a pretty picture of Lincoln There is a lot of denial and court history out there floating around, though.
reply
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @NovaRift 8h
But I'm not entirely against. I consider CNN to be a reliable, and there are books and other online resources for fact checking as well. I guess I'm a bit different here. What media sources do you consider reliable?
reply
You may want to look into the DNC emails that were published by Wikileaks. Many people who work for CNN are literally operatives for the DNC. It's almost entirely a propaganda outlet.
reply
Thank heavens for Wikileaks and Julian Assange for the information that we need but will not see from any state. I hadn’t known that there was hard evidence for CNNLOL operatives being also DNC operatives as well as CIA operatives. Just makes me wonder how tied up with the CIA the DNC is, doesn’t it? There are just too many overlaps to be co-inky-dense.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift 8h
I'll check it out, thanks
reply
None. Gotta go to the original sources to find reliability.
reply