pull down to refresh

USD/BTC = $92,940 Block 879,113
The US State of California – the country’s most populated with around 40 million residents – has unveiled a $310 billion plan to develop and construct a connected mass transit rail system over the next 25 years.
Governor Gavin Newsom announced the project – dubbed the State Rail Plan – on 7 January.
The sprawling high-speed electrified network would stretch across an area more than 500 miles (nearly 900km) long from north to south (Chico to San Diego) with multiple lines running east and west into major metros like San Francisco, San Jose and also Las Vegas, in the neighboring State of Nevada.
The network is said to include intercity, regional, and local transit systems, with a stated goal of making train travel “a more attractive option compared to car or air travel.”
The state said the rail system is designed to produce zero emissions and could create up to 900,000 jobs.
The state said it hopes to increase train travel by its residents by 18%. At present, California rail travel represents just 2% of travelled miles in the state.
A high-speed link between San Francisco and Los Angeles is already in the works, with construction on what could be a $100 billion build picking up again this year after clearing an environmental hurdle. Another line in San Bernardino is expected to start service later this year, while a San Francisco to San Jose corridor opened in September last year. The project has suffered large cost overruns and delays.
In theory these projects sound great but in practice they end up being big money pits. Did the citizens of CA vote for this? Or was this just mandated by the state to help solve road congestion issues. Massive rail does wonders for Japan and Tokyo but I’m not so sure if the same success is to be had in the USA.
3 million bitcoin over 25 years! Wow.
It will never be finished. I drive by one of the lines they have been working on for years. One of the biggest examples of government failure I've ever seen.
reply
Did the citizens of CA vote for this?
Yes, at least for the bond measures to fund it.
California has a proposition system where schemers write legislation that requires to much skin in the game for the legislature and put it on the ballet. These props are often written in ways that are confusing.
I have witnessed props that basically oppose each other pass. Clearly voters don't know what they are doing in these cases.
The origins of the high speed rail project started with Jerry Brown(D). Then Arnold Schwarzenegger(R) pushed a bond to fund it. Brown returned as governor and pushed it forward again. As Newsom came into office it became clear the project was in huge trouble massively going over budget and behind schedule. Newsom pulled back support for the project in an effort to distance himself from Brown's baby.
Today Newsom is touting the project as a success as they have the permits and are ready to lay some track.
At best they will build a line from Bakersfield to Fresno...
I love the Central Valley but this is a joke. The amount of money thrown at this is absurd. One of the biggest issues is that the government has so many barriers to building that even when the government wants to build something their restrictions make it difficult even for them.
Secondly there isn't demand that equals the cost. If there was a private company or group of companies would be seeking to build this. This is simply something that sounded good to Jerry Brown and since it isn't his money he could push the idea. The public is not qualified to make these kinds of judgements and was duped into supporting it. Support for it has decreased in my area. Its a running joke here even though our area would be the first to have service.
They started in this area because its the easiest to build. I can't even imagine how they would built it in LA after watching how it has progressed in the rural Central Valley.
I think trains are great. Just don't think the state should be in this business and we are watching a case study as to why they shouldn't be.
reply
do you remember what year this bond passed?
I'm positive I voted against it because I vote no on anything that mandates more spending
There is also no demand for a high speed rail in CA
"over the next 25 years" ... this is code for never ending project
reply
Its on Wikipedia
There is some demand but not enough to warrant this. Not even close or some private investors would do it.
Thing is, no one is that dumb. Only politicians using other people's money could come up with this kind of project. Its right out of Atlas Shrugged.
reply
These props should have a super majority requirement like 60 percent or 55 percent
reply
Californians love their prop system but they should hate it. Its terrible.
reply
California, the one that is having the trouble with fire? If they cant manage putting out their own fires, how are they going to fund this project? They need to figure out a way out of their problems they have now, instead of creating more debt and problems for the future. Chances are they will run into zoning problems half way into the project and have to cancel it.
reply
All great questions why I wonder if this is bottoms up or top down request
reply
Have they secured the funding for the project?
reply
I don’t think so
reply
I also like how they call it a "scheme". "The scheme seeks to increase mobility across every region of California by creating what state government called “a world-class, fully integrated, zero-emission rail network that connects seamlessly with other transportation modes.”"
reply
wildfires and/or earthquakes will derail this project
reply
More like their management of money will derail the project.
reply