pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 11 Jan \ parent \ on: How might we have permissionless provers and sequencers in ZK rollups? bitcoin
Apparently they are "exploring solutions to support multiple sequencers": https://docs.citrea.xyz/future-research/decentralized-sequencer-network .
Imo on high level if you want to decentralize you either
  • need to make the transactions fully anonymous from the perspective of the single sequencer (so that the sequencer has no idea what it's sequencing) and make it easy to switch another sequencer
  • OR you need a network of sequencers that compete anonymously for fees, so essentially you need bitcoin mining with Nakamoto consensus.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denationalized OP 11 Jan
Assuming the network of sequencers is the solution. L1 Bitcoin miners might as well perform citrea's sequencing and proving. Otherwise, what could be the mechanism of selecting a sequencer from the network of sequencers?
reply