pull down to refresh

I run a a citrea node with citrea --da-layer bitcoin --rollup-config-path ./resources/configs/testnet/rollup_config.toml --genesis-paths ./resources/genesis/testnet. Eager to find weak points of centralization in this architecture I inspected rollup_config.toml finding them in its first section:
[public_keys] sequencer_public_key = "4682a70af1d3fae53a5a26b682e2e75f7a1de21ad5fc8d61794ca889880d39d1" sequencer_da_pub_key = "03015a7c4d2cc1c771198686e2ebef6fe7004f4136d61f6225b061d1bb9b821b9b" prover_da_pub_key = "0357d255ab93638a2d880787ebaadfefdfc9bb51a26b4a37e5d588e04e54c60a42"
As we can see, there is only one prover and only one sequencer. On layer one, an analagous problem was solved with nakamoto consensus and miners. On lightning network there are also many routing nodes, lightning fees being a good reason for this. How might a system be designed so that the provers and sequencers could perform their roles in a permissionless manner? Competition for the users' fees springs to mind as the solution. How such solution could be implemented? Have any ideas been published that address the centralization of provers and sequencers?
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @nout 11 Jan
A good question for citrea guys and @lightcoin ;)
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 11 Jan
Apparently they are "exploring solutions to support multiple sequencers": https://docs.citrea.xyz/future-research/decentralized-sequencer-network .
Imo on high level if you want to decentralize you either
  • need to make the transactions fully anonymous from the perspective of the single sequencer (so that the sequencer has no idea what it's sequencing) and make it easy to switch another sequencer
  • OR you need a network of sequencers that compete anonymously for fees, so essentially you need bitcoin mining with Nakamoto consensus.
reply
Assuming the network of sequencers is the solution. L1 Bitcoin miners might as well perform citrea's sequencing and proving. Otherwise, what could be the mechanism of selecting a sequencer from the network of sequencers?
reply