You’ve highlighted a crucial debate between Bitcoin’s disruptive potential and traditional value investing.

Value Investing vs. Bitcoin: Value investing relies on fundamentals like earnings and dividends, thriving during fiat instability. Bitcoin, with its decentralization and limited supply, doesn’t align with these traditional metrics, making it a challenging fit for value investors.

Bitcoin’s Impact: Bitcoin’s unique features and volatility challenge conventional financial models, potentially rendering some traditional strategies less effective. Its rapid growth and different underlying principles suggest a shift in how value might be perceived in the future.

Future Investment Strategies: While Bitcoin may disrupt traditional approaches, value investing could evolve to incorporate digital assets. Diversification remains key, blending traditional stocks with cryptocurrencies to navigate the changing financial landscape.

Conclusion: Whether value investing remains timeless or adapts depends on market and investor responses. Bitcoin introduces new dynamics, but the fundamental principles of assessing intrinsic value and long-term potential may still hold relevance in this new era.