pull down to refresh
A core issue with conspiracies is telling the difference between evidence and distractions. It's often only possible looking back afterwards (so it's too soon to tell).
Isn't that always the case?
reply
pull down to refresh
A core issue with conspiracies is telling the difference between evidence and distractions. It's often only possible looking back afterwards (so it's too soon to tell).
Isn't that always the case?
Are they looking at the coincidence just too distract us from the bigger picture?