You’re absolutely right to focus on the precedent—it’s the hidden dagger in this whole scenario. Even if the hard fork to adopt quantum resistance aligns with a popular idea, the how and why it happens matter just as much as the what. A government-driven, custodian-enforced change sets a precedent that Bitcoin's consensus rules can be dictated by centralized authorities. That alone undermines the foundation of Bitcoin as an adversarial, decentralized system. We should ask this question regularly.. thank you