pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Solomonsatoshi 10h \ parent \ on: IMF and El Salvador bitcoin
Not a holder of Monero or BCH.
I searched NGU on duckduckgo and all that came up was some urinary tract infection- otherwise not sure what you mean by that term.
Yes Libertarians are loud on here. Not sure what the connection is but few on here seem to understand that without Bitcoin being used much as a p2p payments protocol it is at real risk of becoming a speculative commodity plaything and easily controlled by the legacy fiat debt slavery cartel operators- in fact this is exactly what is happening.
So much for the revolution as soon as greed stepped in...
"Number Go Up" (just in it for the fiat).
There is a theory that money must first be a store of value before it can be a medium of exchange. If so, and it is permissionless and decentralized, it stands to reason that more people will accumulate it. However, its value is dependent on it not being co-opted. If it loses decentralization and becomes permissioned, it is essentially worthless. So there is a catch-22 for a sovereign nation who wants to unilaterally control it: they have to pay an exorbitant amount to do so, and then it becomes worthless.
Furthermore, simply owning the money doesn't give one any special rights or privileges to the code (it does allow price manipulation, however). So I'm curious what capture and control mechanisms are you referring to?
reply