pull down to refresh

Luckily no one is watching these legacy MSM networks anymore except me, but Cramer and David Faber were talking about quantum computing during their opening bell dialogue.
They joked about how far off quantum computing is, and they were amused at how much attention it was getting.
Faber, who is an ironic guy, then says " quantum computing will eventually destroy all cryptography, and that will be the end of bitcoin. "
Now, I think he was joking, but I'm sure there were a few old guy normie investors (CNBC' s demographic) who just got scared.
Is it a big deal? I doubt it, but it's a reminder about the importance of education.
Bullish.
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 4h
The importance of education?
Staying in your lane is more important
reply
I don't want CNBC doing the educating!
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 6h
It's kinda their thing, right?
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 7h
I think we are many years off from quantum computing being a threat to Bitcoin but I also don’t think we should ignore it.
We need to do a hard fork at some point anyways to fix the block number bug. Updating to quantum resistant encryption at the same time would make sense but will the community agree?
reply
54 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 7h
Satoshi already had a game plan for when computers got strong enough to crack the private keye on legacy addresses. There is nothing to worry about.
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 7h
Maybe they can book you as a guest😀
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 7h
I feel a lot of people are letting fear get in the way of healthy conversation. If they would have said that he had thought of somethibg before he made bitcoin, it would calm the crowd a bit.
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 7h
Is it a big deal? I doubt it, but it's a reminder about the importance of education.
100%
The overwhelming majority of FUD comes from ignorance. I understand that people don't have to know everything, so education is important. It's imperative to have people demystifying the FUD that appears, but it's a shame that these educators can't have the visibility of the FUD spreaders.
reply
do you consider yourself educated?
How do you prove it?
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 7h
I saw the title and thought this was in reference to the Saylor interview. They tried that FUD and he knocked it down.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 7h
Imagine if you went on CNBC and told investors "Google has developed a new piece of technology that allows them to steal any EV....so doesn't make sense to buy EVs these days because its only a matter of time before its stolen...."
Now suppose that information was completely false that there was no truth to it.
Would you be fined for market manipulation?
reply
43 sats \ 3 replies \ @rikbona 7h
so this is what caused the lil dip out there? xD
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 7h
Ha! CNBC wishes they had that kind of juice.
reply
Cramer has reverse juice
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 7h
Doubt it
reply