pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 21 replies \ @DarthCoin 10h \ parent \ on: Why isn't one confirmation enough for a bitcoin transaction? bitcoin_beginners
If the RBF have a higher fee and a miner willing to take, it will replace the previous one.
I'm not 'concerned' about the mempool stage, but rather the post-confirmation period (1 confirmation). Just to be clear, 2 confirmations indicate the existence of one block subsequent to the block containing the transaction.
reply
reply
It's not about unconfirmed transactions. RBF is only for unconfirmed transactions waiting in the mempool.
reply
reply
reply
There is nothing of interest here, just @DarthCoin not being able to read.
He probably thinks double-spend always means a confirmed transaction was reverted but the article explicitly mentions that this is about manual RBF which changes the output on unconfirmed transactions.
In case of manual RBF we can specify totally different destination addresses, which can be considered a doublespend.
This is only a doublespend if the receiver accepted a tx with 0 confirmations.
reply
Try it yourself.
Included in a block it doesn't really means is "confirmed".
reply
My main question it's not about unconfirmed transactions. RBF is only for unconfirmed transactions waiting in the mempool. I'm talking about mined transactions.
reply
You can do RBF on a confirmed tx but not with 6 confirmations.
reply
No
reply
read again overtorment's article explaining how he did it.
reply
We got 1 confirmation
unconfirmed = not yet included in 6 blocks
confirmed = included in 6 blocks
reply