pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 10h \ parent \ on: Why isn't one confirmation enough for a bitcoin transaction? bitcoin_beginners
There is nothing of interest here, just @DarthCoin not being able to read.
He probably thinks double-spend always means a confirmed transaction was reverted but the article explicitly mentions that this is about manual RBF which changes the output on unconfirmed transactions.
In case of manual RBF we can specify totally different destination addresses, which can be considered a doublespend.
This is only a doublespend if the receiver accepted a tx with 0 confirmations.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10h
Try it yourself. Included in a block it doesn't really means is "confirmed".
reply