reply on: Grim territory economics \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

42 sats \ 27 replies \ @k00b 11 Dec \ on: Grim territory economics meta

The revenue is exactly what the founder earned so no need to multiply by 0.7.

There's nothing you're missing though. Only a handful have become barely profitable recently.

We'll be lowering territory costs soon which should help some.

10 sats \ 15 replies \ @DesertDave 12 Dec

If lifetime is raised to 4 million, will I still get to pay and additional 2 million if I paid for a year already with the plan to pay for lifetime within this first year? 🫰

22 sats \ 11 replies \ @k00b 12 Dec

I don't think we'll grandfather in potential once buys 😅 .. too complicated

0 sats \ 10 replies \ @DesertDave 12 Dec

Are you joking? I'm confused. I am pretty sure you are joking. Please tell me it's a joke.

11 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b 12 Dec

No I mostly meant that when prices change, they'll change for good. Keeping two sets of prices active (one for people on current plans, just in case, then another for everyone else) is complicated.

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @DesertDave 12 Dec

So if you change it before September I will have to pay 3 mil for lifetime? That doesn't seem right. I have a plan in how I was going to make a lifetime purchase happen and I wouldn't have done it the same if I knew it might change.

10 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 12 Dec

I'm not sure how it's going to work yet. That's why I haven't posted about it. We'll do what's right, whatever that ends up being, but the time hasn't come yet so no worries.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @DesertDave 12 Dec

Okay. I trust you to do what's right. It's going to take a lot for me to come up with the 2 mil as it is. It would really feel shitty for that to change.