pull down to refresh
recorded and available for others to watch.
Bitcoin and generally cryptocurrency Blockchains are public ledgers so recorded and available for others to watch are fundamental features in everyone of them.
What I meant by reusing addresses is a bad practice for privacy was basically described here
So that means you were wrong when you said it:
No, you won't if it's a new address. #786171
No, I was right about it in the sense as explained in the resource I shared not your misunderstanding about the native public property of Blockchain...
I think you just didn’t get @0xbitcoiner‘s point: in the case of consolidation, all inputs are linked together, no matter if he sends them to a new address or not.
I would still use a new address since this slightly increases privacy: with a new address, it is not guaranteed that the output belongs to the same owner of the first address.
Now I get it. Thanks!
No worries. Too many parrots out there with a lack of understanding nuances.
Lol 🤣 take it easy professor...
I must not be understanding something. What's the difference in terms of privacy in sending all utxo's to a new address or to address 1?
Read the article I shared #786251
big parrot vibes
What do you mean by
exposed on the Blockchain?