pull down to refresh

No, I was right about it in the sense as explained in the resource I shared not your misunderstanding about the native public property of Blockchain...
33 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 28 Nov
I think you just didn’t get @0xbitcoiner‘s point: in the case of consolidation, all inputs are linked together, no matter if he sends them to a new address or not.
I would still use a new address since this slightly increases privacy: with a new address, it is not guaranteed that the output belongs to the same owner of the first address.
reply
Now I get it. Thanks!
reply
22 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 28 Nov
No worries. Too many parrots out there with a lack of understanding nuances.
reply
Lol 🤣 take it easy professor...
reply
I must not be understanding something. What's the difference in terms of privacy in sending all utxo's to a new address or to address 1?
reply
Read the article I shared #786251
reply
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 28 Nov
big parrot vibes
reply