pull down to refresh

It’s just a dumb meme I made lol. But according to op only 1% of the global population has ever used it, so there’s probably a sub-group of people, “Bitcoin is NGU technology but i don’t care about the far reaching consequences” 1 or 2 SDs above the average. If you’re thinking like op as in Bitcoin is still early you’re probably among the 0.1% or third standard deviation above average.
i don't think of bitcoin as money only; money is only one function that this technology can fulfill. furthermore, i think the idea of money as we know it has to become obsolete, eliminated. value in its original meaning is a much better term, imho. value as in what gives people strength, valor.
reply
37 sats \ 0 replies \ @dk OP 21 Nov
I like the idea of reimagining what value means to us. I would describe value (or even money) as a coordinated record to help people collaborate on a planetary scale.
Money today is an attempt to track the contributions and debts that are given/owed to people by society/civilization.
Unfortunately, the major systems in use are not very transparent or easily interoperable at a planetary scale. So moving to a more transparent and neutral system of record keeping will be foundational for improving transparency at higher-built layers.
reply