2463 sats \ 6 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 28 Oct \ on: What features or functionalities you'd like to see implemented on SN? meta
-
Territory Analytics: I want to know more about what happens in any given territory with charts and data. Visitors, posts, comments, zaps, and a lot of other data all visualized in a nice clean chart. Something like "Top territories by post but all of the data in a chart instead of just the home feed filters: https://stacker.news/top/territories/forever
-
Boost Analytics: Impressions, click throughs, etc. How much value is someone actually getting when they boost if they don't get analytics.
-
Territory "Pay To Comment" fee minimum should be set by territory founder. I think 1 sat is too low.
-
Paywall Each Username: As a territory founder, I want to be able to paywall specific users instead of outlawing them. I want to paywall them out of my territory so they can always post but they have to pay more than others so I can benefit from being attacked by their spam or low-quality posts.For example: If Alice acts well but Bob is a spammer, I want to be able to keep Alice post fee as the default but increase Bob's pay to post fee to deter his spammy posts. If he continues to spam, I keep raising fees until it's too expensive for him to post and now I was paid to defend my territory.
-
Make it easy to cross post both manually as well as seamless.
-
Sub-Territories: Sub-territories are going to be much more important as soon as we can cross post. When I share a bitcoin movie, I want to be able to share it in ~bitcoin and ~movies and pay both posting fees.
-
Pay to post fee set manually in each sub-territory.
I think sub-territories are more like, you're able to charge x sats for someone to make ~documentaries within your ~movies territory.
reply
Yeah, I think so too but the sub territory needs its own pay to post feature. The parent territory p2p feed may need to be the minimum for all the subs or something. Might need to be whichever is higher between the 2.
Imagine selling a sub-territory and they do nothing but spam and now your territory is tainted with garbage posts and you have no way out.
reply
Right, so I guess one question is, are we giving them a piece of our land (more territory autonomy) or are we letting them build a building on our land (maybe the can only rent, and have less control.)
reply
I like where your head's at. I don't like the idea of rent seeking on a bitcoin standard. I like the idea of ownership but not sure how it can work with a sub-territory.
I think I want to be able to sell/donate a sub-territory and give as much autonomy as possible but still need to prevent spam in my territory. I think a minimum p2p in conjuncture with existing spam filters should work.
reply
That’s a lot! Data is the source of truth, in numeris veritas
reply