30 sats \ 2 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 28 Oct \ parent \ on: What features or functionalities you'd like to see implemented on SN? meta
Yeah, I think so too but the sub territory needs its own pay to post feature. The parent territory p2p feed may need to be the minimum for all the subs or something. Might need to be whichever is higher between the 2.
Imagine selling a sub-territory and they do nothing but spam and now your territory is tainted with garbage posts and you have no way out.
write
preview
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @OneOneSeven 28 Oct
Right, so I guess one question is, are we giving them a piece of our land (more territory autonomy) or are we letting them build a building on our land (maybe the can only rent, and have less control.)
reply
49 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 28 Oct
I like where your head's at. I don't like the idea of rent seeking on a bitcoin standard. I like the idea of ownership but not sure how it can work with a sub-territory.
I think I want to be able to sell/donate a sub-territory and give as much autonomy as possible but still need to prevent spam in my territory. I think a minimum p2p in conjuncture with existing spam filters should work.
reply