pull down to refresh
1013 sats \ 2 replies \ @Aardvark 28 Oct 2024
Banks suing people for using an infinite money glitch is peak irony.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 28 Oct 2024
😂😂😂
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 28 Oct 2024
It is truly ridiculous.
reply
64 sats \ 2 replies \ @btcschellingpnt 28 Oct 2024
Classic misdirection by JP Morgan. Having worked on banking software at various points throughout the last 40 years I can attest that this isn't a "technical glitch" but a *business risk" decision where the bank decided to credit funds to the depositors account at time of deposit, rather than when the cheque cleared.
Was that a stupid decision in hindsight? Der, YEAH! Was it a technical glitch .. no .. it was a stupid decision and unscrupulous customers exploited it ruthlessly.
Of course, if we used bearer money (Bitcoin) rather than credit money (USD/Fiat), none of these issues would exist!
Onwards!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 29 Oct 2024
Maybe. But in this case we can’t entirely blame fiat. The problem is fraud. In this case they were depositing large checks and immediately withdrawing cash before they cleared. Checks represent settled funds in another account, it’s a simple transfer, settling over time. No credit or money was created, just fungible dollars moving through the system.
It’s analogous to replacing an unconfirmed spend or passing an already claimed Ecash voucher. If you don’t verify, (or wait in the case of mainnet), you can get burned if you redeem (eg: settle in LN sats). We may see “infinite sat glitches” as people find fraudulent ways to claim unsettled Bitcoin from the system(s) in the future too.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OriginalSize 29 Oct 2024
They basically broke the softer harder payments rules. You can't give out harder money (cash) for softer money (check) without some additional measures. Usually it's a waiting period but here they took a risk and got caught out. They should win their suits but there's a kind of hubris behind it that shows that they don't value their customers.
reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @tttooocccooolll 28 Oct 2024
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @B_rian 29 Oct 2024
Only JP Morgan (federal reserve member) is allowed to print money out of thin air.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @SatsMate 29 Oct 2024
Hahaha, If I actually found an infinite money glitch, I don't know if I would share it with several million people on tick tock while singing in the back of a car!
I think it is rightfully deserved, but I definitely am not shedding a tear for JP Morgan on this one.
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 28 Oct 2024
imagine finding an infinite money glitch and disclosing the evidence of your crime for worthless internet points on social media
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 28 Oct 2024 bot
https://xcancel.com/Osint613/status/1830212715379327386
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave 28 Oct 2024
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @BlokchainB 28 Oct 2024
God I can’t stand today’s banks. They truly corrupted an institution to help humanity move forward by pooling resources together and providing protection of complete loss. Now they are just profit cows with no consideration for common people
reply
87 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 28 Oct 2024
A far cry from Baily's Building and Loan in It's a Wonderful Life.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 28 Oct 2024
What's weird is that I thought this was legit a crime already (it sure sounds like kiting). If it's not, I can't imagine how they could have a case (but usually, the laws are written to help the banks, so I'd imagine it already is).
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 28 Oct 2024
Somewhere in the small print it should say that you can't spend money that isn't yours. JPMorgan will win the cases! No?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @000w2 28 Oct 2024
Spending money that isn't yours is the definition of banking.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 28 Oct 2024
If banks are doing this, you know they are starting to sweat.
reply