pull down to refresh

If ecash sender and receiver is private from the mint is the redemption process of the ecash for lightning sats private?
Does the mint know who sent it sats to mint ecash with?
does the mint know who redeemed the ecash to send out via lightning?
Is Ecash more private than Monero? πŸ€”πŸ₯·
reply
yes but it's custodial
reply
The mint processes LN deposits and redemptions are LN withdrawals. So your privacy in both cases is the same as the privacy of the corresponding LN tx. Namely, deposits are private, because the sender is private. Withdrawals link to the receiving node.
reply
Sender privacy is good on lightning. Receiver privacy is not. So withdrawing from a mint associates the receiver node pubkey with you
reply
Wath do u mean with that? What do you know if I give you this: lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhx6tcdp6kycmpwqenwwafz69
reply
That is a WoS account. It means it is LOCKED to your mobile IMEI because WoS app cannot be installed without Google services. It means you are kind of tracked, or at least you use a disposable device. NEVER use apps that require google services.
reply
And form this? lnbc250n1pn3uaylpp5xal4wjntfnjvf0k9yxktksvj2wfjlx7m4n66ty2psx5tlla5aumqdqqcqzzsxqrrssrzjqgc2t099trn8g9rqcy7axnnrdk3gu540myw0j0dc0mgmqwf2w3nwhapyqqqqqqqdl5qqqqqqqqqq86qq2qsp5v4zls44d9jkmh62yl724j8raya7qtx0dwnsxqun0cnw3g7x0q9tq9qxpqysgqf784uwgspwsrzfwea8nwnk5qzt07qj6w6wd6gff7x0tm427pzmqjmajjcnlz8fusplk68q4enhzyr753p855yzmt0d4lr7wauxd54ucpqnpp2n
reply
You will see there the destination of your node. But that doesn't mean we can find you, your location or who you are. It could be very easily a private node.
reply
Why the people say that an invoice can expose the utxo that founded the channel @DarthCoin?
so the mint knows which token was associated with which pubkey sats withdrawal but does not know which node sent in the sats
reply
Why did you say the receiver privacy is not good?
reply
@DarthCoin explained in #742276.
Another privacy issue with LN in general is that HTLCs use the same payment hash for every hop so surveillance nodes could track payments which happen to route through them. PTLCs fix that.
reply
@ek I don't think he explained well. Can you explain it to me?
reply
What did you not understand in his explanation?
reply
Why the receiver privacy is not good in the lightning network?
No, It didn't. So, can you explain?
reply
hmmm that's why SN wants to be the "interceptor" for all so called p2p zaps in SN? To find out each stacker node?
hehehe that's why I like to run decoy nodes and wallets. Nice try SN, πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
Receiver privacy is not.
Now with blinded paths, yes.
reply
I assume you want me to assume you’re not trolling again?
reply
define trolling
reply
what you’re doing πŸ‘€
reply
what am I doing? commenting your posts? Is that not allowed here? I paid for it, remember? Or now all comments are considered trolling ? Ok let's rename SN into "pay to troll" then.
i ask these questions when thinking about an ecash wallet where you have a username.
what activity do they know about you when using ecash and moving from lightning to ecash on that wallets platform?