pull down to refresh
2251 sats \ 30 replies \ @justin_shocknet 18 Oct \ on: LNhance LAUNCHES WEBSITE🎊🎊🎊 (THE GREATEST OF SOFT FORKS) bitcoin
"LNhance" is affinity-driven neologistic manipulation being pushed by scammers.
The purpose of this particular psyop/scam is to prop up FUD narratives around Lightning to gain support for their fake L2 shitcoinery.
Don't be fooled by scammer narratives. These are shitcoiners.
Bro WTF are you talking about, it's just an upgrade combining a few op_codes. One of the devs works at SWAN there is no FUD narratives and there is no fake L2 or altcoin, it's just combining some op_codes, at least learn how to code before spouting off some nonsense.
reply
It's just a harmless upgrade bro just try my new op_code bro don't like it dont use it bro, seriously bro not FUD bro its just a broken chain bro we can fix it bro totally not a scam bro
learn how to code
lol fucking clueless
reply
🤣🤣🤣🍿🍿🍿🍿
Justin I think you should have a nuanced convo with Rearden or Moonsettler.
reply
I thought the moon retard rage quit a few months ago, scammers always come back for another bite at the apple I guess.
Scammers like this don't engage in nuanced conversations, they repeat emotional appeals to needs non-technical people can understand, and copy paste half-assed diagrams and technobabble that fool the 99.5% of people that can't parse as non-solutions.
They're snake oil dealers, only the snake oil is shitcoins ("vTXOs")
reply
Sorry to say it Justin, but this is the most sentimental and retarded shit I've seen you say, and I've seen you see sentimental and retarded shit, but this is something else.
It's like Buttcoin and Bitcoin Maximalisn had a son with internet access.
Consider it whatever you want, but your options are:
- Cope
- Deal with it
- All of the above + accept that this was absolutely retarded from your part.
I recommend you follow option 3.
strong statements there
reply
judging from his past history on this site there's no way justin has the ability to have a nuanced conversation...
reply
Scammers love tone policing because they can't break through with substance, it's either mean tweets or WW3. So Gfy.
If you could stop scam simping things you don't understand anything about technically for even a second, you could explain plainly how a vTXO isn't a shitcoin.
My tone doesn't matter if you could, but you can't and won't.
reply
Ark is one of the primary uses so far of VTXOs and they are most certainly not an altcoin, it's not much different then people sharing UTXOs with lightning. Extremely simply to understand if you're not intent on being contrarian and do any little bit of research at all.
reply
Ark is no different than any other sidechain scam before it.
Just because it's native shitcoin is "pegged" to Bitcoin doesn't make it Bitcoin, anymore than the Liquid scam.
Lightning doesn't share UTXO's, a channel point resolves to 1 UTXO per party. If Lightning did share UTXO's, retards wouldn't feel the need to FUD it over fake scalability concerns.
Get a clue then try again.
reply
WTF? Ark isn't even a sidechain, dude do you seriously just shitpost and do no research at all?
resolves to 1 UTXO per party
Yah, just like I said, 2+ people sharing a UTXO and CTV can allow for channel factories where more than 2 people can share UTXOs
You clearly have done zero research and just proceed to throw adhominems around like confetti.
shockingly I'm anti-spam, but it seems you're pro 1MB block size. So I'll leave it at that
reply
I have no idea what that means. I cant even remember the last time I talked about blockspace, the block-size isn't changing, and also big blockers were confirmed to be retards years ago so there's no need to re-hash it.
reply
wtf are you talking about most of the op codes aren't even new, CTV has been around for over 4 years and the rest have been researched for years. Do you not pay attention to bitcoin development at all or something?
reply
That's why a nuanced conversation is important. I don't think ad hominem is necessary cos it's a net-positive for most people to really be on board and critique critically.
Your passion is admirable tho @theonevortex
reply
appreciate you bro!
reply
@moonsettler thoughts on @justin_shocknet thinking this is FUD
Also @justin_shocknet what do you think about the Vault setup?
reply
Justin is too deranged to debate with. and he is not equipped to handle a technical debate anyhow. so i don't feel the need to bother with addressing his claims.
reply
technical debate
That's the last thing you want because I see through your bullshit. #729559
You're pushing to abstract away real Bitcoin via a single UTXO consensus system for "virtualizing" transactions. That means either you're the deranged one, or more likely, just another scammer shilling yet another worthless sidechain like anyone who's been around has seen countless times before. You're twist on it is pretending its not a sidechain.
GFY.
reply
thank you for proving my point!
reply
The features and efficiencies that CTV can bring to vaults are huge not to mention being able to create even bigger arks.
reply
The vault use-case is meant to sound harmless, but seems more of a Hegelian dialectic for covenants and outsourcing security. If locktimes and multisig are inadequate for ones storage needs then no added scripting nonsense is going to help.
reply
again, thanks for demonstrating my point!
for the audience: you get better security better inheritance clauses and better backup schemes with CTV, and without losing any sovereignty or exposing yourself to third party / threshold risks. that's the whole point.
reply
No one cares, multisig and locks work fine
You're just backpedaling from your fake L2 scaling scam, ethtard
reply