I honestly hadnt seen anything about him and XRP though I will say since his law firm is strickly designed for BTC and crypto it does make sense. Dont worry he's by no means a hero though he is the lesser of two evils which I feel is what a lot of this election cycle is going to come down to.
Really. He mentioned XRP in the debate. He said if it wasn't for him suing to make XRP legal then Chris Larsen wouldn't have been able to bribe (sorry donate) to Kamala Harris. You know that Chris Larsen guy that gave Greenpeace 5M bucks to run an attack ad on Bitcoin. Of course then you have his co-conspirator Brad Garlinghouse who was widely rebuked in silicon valley as a bad actor. No one wanted to do business with him.
These are the kind of characters that you support when you carry water for "crypto".
reply
I'm being honest I didn't listen to the debate. I was packing up yesterday and now I am at the airport to fly back home. I took a mixture of comments highlighted by both people as well as what I have learned interacting with Warren and her staff before. I know that Garlinghouse has been a nightmare for the industry and XRP in my opinion isn't even worth it anymore because technology caught up.
Larsen did pull a really quick switch up which I have been trying to figure out if he is doing it because he is hedging his bets since a ton of crypto has been pro-Trump (not talking about BTC just the crypto-funded PACs).
Given my experience with Warren she doesn't want to learn about the industry. She made up her mind and that was it. At least to me that is way worse than someone who also deals in shitcoins.
reply