@k00b maybe I am wrong, but I think SN is drunk: for more I tip posts or comments, more I receive back every day from redistribution. Are you running a fractional reserve or something ? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
Haha I noticed the same. But also happens that I only received a single sat after I tipped a lot of comments/posts (if I even slightly liked them for example).
I have to look into the code for this trust mechanism etc. to understand it deeply.
It's kind of very exciting at least to see how many sats you received via the distribution.
reply
Four things affect rewards for tipping:
  1. how high the content ranked relative to other content
  2. how early you tipped it
    • All else being equal, 2nd tipper gets half the 1st, 3rd gets 1/3rd, and so on
  3. how much you tipped
  4. your trust level, e.g. how reliably you are at upvoting good content early
reply
Yes, I read about this. But I am still interested to look into the code which implements this when I have time.
I think your approach is an innovation in itself. Were you inspired by something to come up with this? Web of trust in GPG for example?
You mean it's not from the posting you do?
reply
Rewards pay out based on positing, commenting, and upvoting.
reply
We have discussed this matter in some detail before. I meant this more in regards to @Darthcoin as a user. That they post/comment a lot, which I expect would garner receiving more upvotes as well. Would that last part feature in rewards, or doe that work only based on ones own upvotes?
reply
Yes if your content ranks higher you get more rewards, but it’s also more competitive than upvoting. Very few people upvote good stuff early.
reply
but would you say if some of those few people were power users? :) Not to suggest our friend as a power user...
reply
They are a committed minority for sure if that’s what you mean by power user.
Sifting through recent needs to be done and is, without literal rewards, unrewarded.
reply