pull down to refresh
Good question. In this case it was only the business account, but it's not a question of shielding liability like an asset protection specialist might advise. The government will pursue the money itself, wherever it flows. It makes no difference who owns the account or in what capacity.
As to the degree of separation, the person accused of criminal activity directly paid my client.
Was just the business account or did they go for the personal accounts to? Have you heard of any "best practice" to limit exposure?