I wonder how that will work fee wise. You will have to pay all three fees or will a cross post fee be a static fee that is split by the territories it is posted across?
I haven't seen them lay out the vision for it. I think there should be some economizing on the fees. Maybe you pay each territory's 70% share, but only the smaller of the chunks that would go to rewards.
I also don't know how zaps would work in cases where one person cross-posts another stacker's post.
You'd only crosspost your own posts during creation to start. "I want it to go in these three territories."
As far as I've thought about it, you'd pay the sum of the base fees for all territories you're posting in. Zaps fee would be split evenly between founders most likely.
Well, you could also have some sort of weighting that's inversely proportional to posting fees, in order to even out territory revenue on these posts (and incentivize lower posting fees).
With even shares, there's a little incentive to have higher territory fees, because you get an equal share of zaps regardless of your fee, plus your entire fee (or 70% of it, to be more accurate).
There would also be the more ideal version of attributing zaps to a specific territory, if the reader found it through a specific territory.
Cross posting would be interesting.
There are times I look through the list and think about where I can post.
Usually I pick the one with the smaller fee lol
But to tell you the truth, I shouldnt really be worrying about the fee anymore.
I have enough sats to just pick one regardless.
The sats usually come back with zaps, or through the leadership board by the end of the night.
At least in my case.
Unbelievably they are both still around. Nick went into semi-retirement but is back and will be facing Vicent Luque before the end of the year. Nate has been fighting more regularly but is currently a free agent. Why either are still fighting is entirely beyond me.