reply on: Peter Todd - warmonger shill! \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

11.1k sats \ 12 replies \ @kristapsk 24 Sep \ on: Peter Todd - warmonger shill! bitcoin

Supporting victims rights of self-defense is not warmongering. Neither on street level between two individuals nor at bigger scale.

100 sats \ 11 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 24 Sep

The victims are the ones supporting banksters wars. Are you one of them?

121 sats \ 10 replies \ @petertodd 24 Sep

Tell me, what do you think is going to happen to Ukraine if they don't have the weapons necessary to defend themselves?

121 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 24 Sep

I do not fucking care"! ALL WARS ARE BANKSTERS WARS! If you participate or support any war you are a fucking bankster wars supporter!

152 sats \ 2 replies \ @petertodd 24 Sep

So tell me, if a Russian invader is pointing a gun at me, am I "supporting" that Russian war by shooting them? Am I "supporting" that Russian war by helping people I know buy weapons to kill those invaders?

I've personally talked to civilians in Kyiv in the early stages of the invasion who were in that situation: they had gotten their personal, civilian, hunting rifles out from their safe and were hunkered down in the basement parking of their apartment building, ready to kill any Russians who entered in a last stand if needed. Other people they knew further away from Kyiv had been killed by that same Russian invasion force.

Were those people "supporting" that "bankster war" by getting their guns ready for a last stand?

121 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin OP 24 Sep

Just by supporting a CIA war is making you a CIA asset. That's it. so sincerely... FUCK OFF..

160 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd 24 Sep

So what are you saying here? Are you saying that elderly couple I know, among others, were CIA assets because they got their guns out to be ready to kill Russian invaders if needed? You're saying defending your home makes you a supporter of a "bankers war"?

Or are you just spouting nonsense and can't actually come up with a coherent position?

1140 sats \ 0 replies \ @kristapsk 24 Sep

So, basically, if you don't just allow to kill yourself by other party, you are bankster war supporter?

21 sats \ 4 replies \ @openyoureyes 24 Sep

There will be peace if there is only one army. One side always wins. You have to accept that it will be the russian side. Everything else is nuclear.

240 sats \ 3 replies \ @kristapsk 24 Sep

There will not be peace in Europe until Russia is defeated. If Ukraine loses, Russia will not stop there.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @openyoureyes 24 Sep

Why? Because putin wants to rule the world? I think it is the usa who want to rule the world. Russia wants a multipolar world. America will not stop to try to invade every country on earth. Same old story.

120 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk 24 Sep

They definitely think of Finland, Baltics, Poland as their "lost territories". They openly talk about that in state TV discussion shows every week.

But there is also old Russian hardcore imperialist idea about "empire from Vladivostok to Lisbon" (although Chinese don't like that idea definitely, as Vladivostok is old Chinese town, taken from them in 19th century).

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @openyoureyes 24 Sep

You forgot to mention east germany. And it seems that the people in east germany undestand russia and the mayority voted for partys that want to stop supporting this war (afd+bsw) So maybe ask yourself why this people do not fear russia. The people in east germany are happy about not having US bases everywhere like in west germany.