45 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 16 Sep \ parent \ on: Sahkaan Wahlook AMA lol
Yes, but it is a hard problem because to his point you don't want people just posting drivel to get volume numbers and just zapping everything. I understand the complexity of the problem which I why I haven't suggest the algo be changed. You guys are smarter than me. If you can figure out a way to improve it while still providing the same spam resistance I think I would be in favour.
The only answer that comes to mind is to stop zapping out of courtesy.
Although, it may be a solution in search of a problem. K00b told me that most of the long time stackers have almost perfect trust scores, which is the mechanism that would be the issue with courtesy zapping.