79 sats \ 13 replies \ @didiplaywell OP 2 Sep \ parent \ on: From SN to NS meta
That's an opportune remark because I see it the opposite way and it's an important aspect to underscore: the fact SN still lacks the properties I'm mentioning regarding its connection to Nostr might be the reason people that had to set sail had to also cut ties. No one who left could bring something with them. Whereas, if SN provides the wallet, the keys, and the logging, it will keep being the port people will come back to.
By all means SN shall remain minimalistic, but I think it's two twitches from reaching the "digital port" potential.
There's no conflict between minimalism and growth. The minimalism comes from extreme conscientiousness about what changes are made. Better integration with nostr also strikes me as being important to explore.
For regulatory reasons, SN won't be providing wallets. I agree with you, though, that it's a great current feature and would be useful to build up.
reply
For regulatory reasons, SN won't be providing wallets
We could provide a wallet interface though. Connect your wallet to SN and then connect that wallet through SN to different site. That might be useful if the site doesn’t support your wallet but SN does or if you like the wallet logs or management in SN or don’t want to leak your node pubkey.
So basically you could use your SN lightning address as a translation layer between wallet connections for receiving but I don’t know how that would work for sending.
reply
reply
Yessssss yes to all, this is the way I see SN evolving, hence the "digital port" analogy
reply
There's no conflict between minimalism and growth.
But, I see it the same way, I'm not arguing against that. On the contrary, I think that just some twitches on the structure and operation of some tools SN already has and the ones that are in development can unblock potential within the same minimalism.
For regulatory reasons, SN won't be providing wallets.
Very sad to hear that, I didn't know nor expected that there were regulatory constraints on those tools :/
reply
I don't think we were disagreeing. I just wanted to spell out that point.
The wallet situation is a little sad, but that will just have to be something people learn how to do on SN, but actually do elsewhere.
reply
But I did wanted to disagree, then pretend I didn't, and then go back and forth letting chaos ensue. I can't work this way @Undisciplined, I hope you will reconsider your attitude.
reply
Fine! You're wrong about everything, you son of a bitch!
reply
ahhhh... this is what social interaction is about :')
reply
reply
Yes sorry, I should have been more specific, I didn't meant the posts, but SN tools.