I know it seems hard to believe in the political environment as it exists now, where everyone has to pick a team to root for, but I didn't post this to defend Trump, and I doubt Reason did either. Both parties are a disaster. For me, Trump pressuring Powell to cut interest rates to juice the stock market is just one example that I recall, in addition to those you mentioned.
Price Controls are not the answer. Corporations are an easy scapegoat. History proves this. The last time it was tried in the US was 1971, by a Republican president. It was a disaster.
Yeah, I am not doubting your or Reason's intention of posting/writing.
I'm just observing that this is simply how politics works. You portray yourself as the savior who will swoop in and fix everything for everyone. That's just the game as I've observed it over my lifetime.
Agreed price controls are not the answer. However, I think media spinning of the facts is also important to observe. Kamala's proposal (which literally no one has seen, and I would bet has not even been written) is a price gouging proposal.
Most US states already have similar price gouging laws on the books, including very conservative states. From the extremely limited information we have heard from Kamala about this, it appears she wants to implement some type of national version of this so the federal government could also police corporations who price gouge.
Personally, I don't care for it, but I also think it is hypocritical for folks to yell and scream about this national proposal (which again, no one has seen or knows any detail about) vs yelling and screaming to get rid of the laws that are already on the books to prevent price gouging such as:
Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act: § 4-88-301 Alabama Unconscionable Pricing Act: § 8-31-1 South Carolina Unfair Trade Practice Act: § 39-5-145 Tennessee Price-Gouging Act § 47-18-5101 Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act: § 17.4627
Lastly, I'd note that without having the house/senate/presidency, basically no law gets passed in modern America (save for Biden's presidency where there were unusually some bipartisan bills passed).
reply
No doubt price gouging laws are on the books of many states. I would argue that price gouging is a euphemism for price control, and it's much more dangerous on the federal level, as it affects everyday interstate commerce, as opposed to the state laws that are limited geographically and usually are only applied in short term, emergency situations.
economist Brian Albretch has laid out clearly why she in fact did, writing that "any policy that gives the government the power to decide what price increases are 'fair' or 'unfair' is effectively a price control system.
reply