To the extent that I've thought about how we'll be decentralized, territory fees are hosting/indexing fees. If we don't host, they don't pay us. If some other territory hoster/indexer wants to host, the illicit territory will pay them, or they'll host/index the toxic/illicit territory themselves and pay no one.

k00b

> Territories can be marked nsfw by their founders.

Let's take an extreme example. In the future, when territories are whatever you ultimately want them to be, what's to stop a bad actor from buying an ordinary territory and loading it up with illicit content?

It seems like you need to maintain a way to break ties with territories that behave in such a way, if you don't want to maintain an ultimate veto right over content.

Undisciplined

This Day on SN: August 19

Territories can be marked nsfw by their founders.

> That's not the long-term vision, though, right? 

That is not the long-term vision.

> What's the defense against that?

A lot of the nostr relays block content they deem inappropriate using AI filters afaik. 