This Day on SN: August 19
583 sats \ 10 comments \ @sn 19 Aug meta freebie
zaps forwarded to @Undisciplined (50%) @abetusk (10%) @andyleroy (10%)

Top Posts

Top Stackers
  • stacker is in hiding for August 19, 2023
  • @andyleroy
    • 539 stacked \ 1564 spent \ 1 post \ 5 comments \ August 19, 2022
  • @abetusk
    • 1 stacked \ 5 spent \ 0 posts \ 1 comment \ August 19, 2021

Top Comments

Top Territories
  • ~bitcoin
    • 48.7k stacked \ 0 revenue \ 59.6k spent \ 63 posts \ 388 comments \ August 19, 2023
  • ~bitcoin
    • 37.8k stacked \ 0 revenue \ 44.1k spent \ 87 posts \ 230 comments \ August 19, 2022
  • ~bitcoin
    • 48 stacked \ 0 revenue \ 91 spent \ 8 posts \ 16 comments \ August 19, 2021
write
preview
related posts
35 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 19 Aug
I really appreciated Michelson_Morley’s post. He got a bit of a rough ride here on SN. Some of it deserved. Unfortunate he doesn’t post anymore.
reply
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined fwd 19 Aug
I remember the nym, but I don't recall any interactions. What was the source of conflict?
reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 19 Aug
Mostly tension around his disdain for bitcoin maximalism. He also had a lot of critiques for SN. I believe at one point he said it was doomed to fail unless xyz.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satoshi__Nakamoto 19 Aug
Territories btc is domaniteig
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined fwd 19 Aug
Obviously that OnlyFans post was made in jest, but what actually stops something like that from happening?
I know that right now @k00b and @ek can take stuff down. That's not the long-term vision, though, right? The dream is for territories to be uncensorable.
We could also think about nostr, rather than SN. It seems like a very easy attack vector would be to flood a platform (using the term loosely) with illicit material. What's the defense against that?
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 19 Aug
Territories can be marked nsfw by their founders.
That's not the long-term vision, though, right?
That is not the long-term vision.
What's the defense against that?
A lot of the nostr relays block content they deem inappropriate using AI filters afaik.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined fwd 19 Aug
Territories can be marked nsfw by their founders.
Let's take an extreme example. In the future, when territories are whatever you ultimately want them to be, what's to stop a bad actor from buying an ordinary territory and loading it up with illicit content?
It seems like you need to maintain a way to break ties with territories that behave in such a way, if you don't want to maintain an ultimate veto right over content.
reply
107 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 19 Aug
To the extent that I've thought about how we'll be decentralized, territory fees are hosting/indexing fees. If we don't host, they don't pay us. If some other territory hoster/indexer wants to host, the illicit territory will pay them, or they'll host/index the toxic/illicit territory themselves and pay no one.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 19 Aug
But became disillusioned.
It's true for most of us! Isn't it?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Octopus 19 Aug outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.