With a fresh phrase I got this message:
too broad permission: lnrpc.Wallet.SendCoins
You’re giving us too much control so we’re not letting you proceed. You’ll need to create a custom session, select custodial and input a budget. It’ll create a little budgeted account.
reply
Success! Damn, that was satisfying.
reply
Wow with send and receive now active no longer need this hosted wallet!
reply
Congratulations!
reply
I feel oddly compelled to try as many wallet connections as possible
reply
The idea is if one fails we’ll try another, so not that odd.
reply
That's what I'm thinking too. If we all keep trying different combinations maybe we'll hit the sweet spot. Do you think any type connection should give better performance than the others?
reply
NWC probably has the best overall performance without a ton of other complications.
LNC has a bunch of limitations. LNBits requires a public ip and cert, and so on.
reply
It would be great if someone on SN would build a basic, secure, NWC connect wallet, like @supertestnet is doing. But, will NWC always require a fedimint/cashu type custodial mint?
Imo end state is bolt12 for receiving (sooner than later) and something like a bolt12 but for sending (later than sooner).
So LNC is now working?!?
reply
Yes it is. It's send only. I'm using a lightning address for receive.
reply
Yup I’m locked and loaded now!! 💪💪
reply
Yeah that will be my approach too
reply