People seem to forget this part of the Nixon shock. He was a Republican!
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
99 sats \ 0 replies \ @Golu 19 Aug 2024
Much similar to this has happened in india in 1984 emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi.
reply
0 new comment
129 sats \ 1 reply \ @JesseJames 18 Aug 2024
They are both part of the same Cabal. Wrong is wrong no matter how you slice it.
"Those who don't remember the past are condemn to repeat it" - Santayana
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 18 Aug 2024
Yep
reply
0 new comment
74 sats \ 5 replies \ @Satosora 18 Aug 2024
"As President George W. Bush put it in 2008, sometimes you have to “abandon free-market principles to save the free-market system.”"
Its funny how they impose these on the people under them, especially when as a president there is no wage increase.
reply
0 new comment
51 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 OP 19 Aug 2024
I'll never forget the fall of 2008, watching the president from the supposed free market party socialize our economy in the span of a few weeks.
reply
0 new comment
74 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 19 Aug 2024
They werent the only people to panic, though.
Everyone was busy unloading everything they could.
reply
0 new comment
63 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 19 Aug 2024
Any wonder why the Tea Party formed after 2008 financial crisis? Why populism became popular after 2009?
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 19 Aug 2024
Tea Party on the right
Occupy Wall Street on the left
Edit: and Bitcoin quietly gestating outside it all. How could I forget.
reply
0 new comment
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 25 Dec 2024
The tea party basis was forming before 2008. Ron Paul had been around a long time by then and was popular with the people in the know. Lew Rockwell had his website up and running and was getting some high powered anti-war folks going, too.
reply
0 new comment
74 sats \ 2 replies \ @SatsMate 18 Aug 2024
On paper it looks like a great idea, just like socialism. Everything devolves when we face price controls and handouts.
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @DEADBEEF 19 Aug 2024
Many things look good on paper but in practice they are terrible. So many people fail to take into account that we live in an imperfect world when designing their “utopias” on paper.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 19 Aug 2024
They don’t look good on paper. They sound good on television.
Appeals to emotion and compassion
Sentiment cannot be the basis of public policy
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 18 Aug 2024
Yup
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 4 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 18 Aug 2024
The party lines were so odd back then -- I don't know if you remember Bill Green, the Republican Representative from NYC, but he was way further to the left than probably at least half the Dems back then.
reply
0 new comment
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 OP 18 Aug 2024
I kind of remember the name. NYC
Mayor Lindsay was pretty far left too. In New York those guys were called Rockefeller Republicans.
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 2 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 18 Aug 2024
Oh yeah, Lindsay was a bit before me, but I remember reading about him. And yeah, I remember Rockefeller Republicans. Pretty sure it's been a long time since that term could be applied to anyone.
reply
0 new comment
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 18 Aug 2024
John Rockefeller was a regular Republican not a Rockefeller Republican like his grandson
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 19 Aug 2024
That's for sure!
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 18 Aug 2024
I just found this out recently.
reply
0 new comment
71 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 18 Aug 2024
I'm so old I remember watching the announcement on TV with my dad. He was a free market capitalist, but he also loved Nixon. He just assumed Tricky Dick knew what he was doing
reply
0 new comment
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 18 Aug 2024
Tricky was a silent populist
He consistently ignored the advice of Milton Friedman
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 18 Aug 2024
As they say, only Nixon could go to China.
reply
0 new comment
82 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 18 Aug 2024
That was a smart move in 1972. A diplomatic revolution
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 18 Aug 2024
The price controls not so much, though.
reply
0 new comment
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satoshi__Nakamoto 19 Aug 2024
That's a great thing for them
reply
0 new comment
63 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 19 Aug 2024
@didiplaywell
90 second clip
reply
0 new comment
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @didiplaywell 19 Aug 2024
God bless him
reply
0 new comment
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 19 Aug 2024
About 2 minutes
Edit: almost 3 minutes. Where did 3 dollars go?
reply
0 new comment
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 18 Aug 2024
Nixon was worried about price gouging not gauging.
Either way terrible decision by Nixon
reply
0 new comment
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 25 Dec 2024
I don’t know who the author is trying to kid, but people just loved the first freeze. Inflation had just started to run and Nixon was running, too. They voted him in solidly.
Then the economic reactions hit after the inauguration, they were not nice. Nixon pulled himself out by negotiating a way out of ‘Nam, thus focusing attention on the war and peace. Then Watergate hit big time.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Octopus 18 Aug 2024 outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.