pull down to refresh

I'm not trying to speculate about the culprit.
There was a big Seymour Hersch article about this, shortly after the event. I thought it was more or less the accepted account. Obviously, the US Government will never admit to it, if it was them.
this territory is moderated
I'm going with Hersch. Didn't Nuland practically telegraph this? Then Blinken could barely contain his joy. Occam's Razor
reply
78 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 15 Aug
Nuland always explained quite well their neocon warfare
reply
Yes she did
reply
That's right. I had forgotten about them doing the whole "That's a nice pipeline you've got there. It would be a shame if something happened to it." routine.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @Cje95 14 Aug
Huh I dont remember seeing that article but tbh I still don't think we would have been able to execute it to the level that we have and if we did I think we would have done a top-notch job at framing Russia with no chance of Ukraine ever being thought as the culprit. As soon as people think Ukraine is responsible by default the US comes into focus and then the CIA
reply
Initially, people thought is was silly to suspect Ukraine as the culprit, because they don't have that kind of military capacity or deep sea demolition capability. The US was the prime suspect right away.
reply
Organized by the UK, fulfilled by a coalition of ukranians, poles and 'friends' from Norway.
reply
Because it is so apparent it would be the US is kinda what makes me think maybe it was someone in the Middle East who needed a reason to build out their LNG like the UAE, Qatar, I think Saudi has it as well since they have so much crude oil.....
reply