Wow, that's great. I am also curious to know this. But right now I am using my mobile phone.

When will this be possible through mobile?

That'd be amazing! When we can look at the number of people who zapped, we can know the popularity. With the zap amount we only see how big is the post zapped.

But, If I say that we can already understand this by looking at the top posts for the day. I've seen that some top posts don't have too much sats. While some posts with big amount of sats is well below those posts.

So, I'm ok with or without it.

I'd love this at least as an option. Seeing 10K sats on a post tells me that the stacker's making some bank, not that it's a great post. Seeing that 15 people have zapped it tells me that there's community consensus that it's worth reading (and yes, the algorithm should help here, but I also like raw data).

Comments are also useful, but they're not quite the same thing. Seeing fifteen comments on a post tells me it's creating a discussion or debate, but a post can be worthwhile or useful without that.

Yes, I agree. It would surely be a sybil buster.

My main opposition to this is visual clutter. That's why we do the hover. The hover isn't great though so maybe the right approach is to do something better than the hover.

I don't use mobile, but I think it's a good idea. It should take them 10 minutes to implement this.

Seems intelligent. I just figured out how to do the hovering today! I remember it was in a previous post, but I could never get it to work.

I like how you and @Undisciplined and @grayruby are always exploring ways to make things better on SN

Wow, I didn't know this was a thing! I'm a mobile user as well, so I'm definitely interested. Thanks for mentioning it.

Yes, do it Zappers counter is more informative than zaps amount

Should be an easy enough addition to add beside the number of sats and comments. I am ok with the hovering because I usually use my laptop but you are right about mobile, I don't think there is a way to know.

In terms of the Sybil blasting point. I think we need to be careful making assumptions. I often zap 1k sats on a really awesome or creative post. For instance, that little baseball story Herschel posted in the sports territory yesterday. I zapped that 1k sats and was the only one to zap for awhile. I often zap the pool posts 1k sats to juice the pot. So, I don't think it is always something untoward occurring but I do think it could help us identify repeat offenders. If it is happening over and over to the same poster then probably they are zapsturbating.

I thought this was going to be about people who zap posts without checking how many other zappers there were.

Good idea! Thank You

Yep good post is been somewhat ignored Some people post on stacker with out using Ai tools ⚙ although they don't get that much readers