Immigrants first vs Citizens first

Foreigners vs America first

That's the textbook libertarian moto, the term must be "libertarian". But having the current "Libertarian Party" as face value is going to be an agony you have to tackle smartly or you're going to hate them so much that will turn just in a standard "conservative".

The fact that you can not think of one already says a lot. That's the representativity crisis we faced for a long and agonizing time prior to Milei. When Milei appeared we where able to call ourselves "libertarians". But prior to that the term was unusable, not only because of an Overton Window way far to the left, but also because the political development state of existing libertarian parties was shameful. It was so full of jerks and wannabees that you had to have a strong stomach to survive the first years. At first it was impossible to defend, even if the conviction in the ideas was absolute, the lack of leadership, and even more, the over-abundance of mediocre wannabee clowns trying to seize the moment, made the self-called "libertarian" political space so unreliable, that from the 3 (three!!!) self-called "libertarian" parties already in existence none was admitted into the coalition that made Milei president. So dire the situation was.

I'm fairly well acquainted with the state of the "Libertarian Party" of the USA and, Jo Jorgensen aside, it's as lame as the original "Libertarian Party" here (which was, and is, so terribly bad that Milei refused to be associated with them, having to form an entire new separate party from scratch, "La Libertad Avanza").

So, what word to use is an important and key challenge. It ought to be "libertarian", but there's a lot of underpinning to do to make that work.