pull down to refresh

68 sats \ 10 replies \ @siggy47 OP 4 Aug \ parent \ on: For Territory Bulls Only- Are You Ready For A Fire Sale? meta
Even the ones that seem unnecessary can always change their name and focus. Nothing stops an owner from changing the name of a territory and its direction at any time.
write
preview
67 sats \ 9 replies \ @Satosora 4 Aug
That is true. I feel many of the territories cover the same topics, or can just be expanded. Maybe it might be better to form a group and merge them? That way cost could go down for both?
reply
43 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Aug
I've been wondering about whether we'll see territory mergers. I think they discussed that possibility at some point.
reply
41 sats \ 7 replies \ @Satosora 4 Aug
Mergers or Co-owners. Will be an interesting future.
reply
20 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Aug
I really hope they do co-ownership soon. That's what we would prefer to do with ~econ.
reply
42 sats \ 5 replies \ @Satosora 4 Aug
you and who? Can I get in on the action? lol
reply
20 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Aug
Me and the current owner, who doesn't have as much time to manage the territory as he would like. I don't know how he feels, but I'm all for having multiple owners and doing an equity sharing arrangement.
reply
62 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 4 Aug
I havent seen @jeff comment. Multiple owner territories would be cool.
reply
41 sats \ 0 replies \ @jeff 4 Aug
Thanks for tagging me.
reply on another page
71 sats \ 1 reply \ @jeff 4 Aug
Yah, @Undisciplined and I are on same page. I basically try to operate as if donors are co-owners now, but since its just bleeding money, there isnt actually that much to do/control othet than post cost, and I'm where the buck-stops, and also I don't want the liability of accidentally issuing a security, there is no commitment of sharing a claim to anything.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 4 Aug
Oh man, this is the first time I have seen your comment! A legend is in the house!
reply on another page