68 sats \ 10 replies \ @siggy47 OP 4 Aug \ parent \ on: For Territory Bulls Only- Are You Ready For A Fire Sale? meta
Even the ones that seem unnecessary can always change their name and focus. Nothing stops an owner from changing the name of a territory and its direction at any time.
reply
I've been wondering about whether we'll see territory mergers. I think they discussed that possibility at some point.
reply
reply
I really hope they do co-ownership soon. That's what we would prefer to do with ~econ.
reply
reply
Me and the current owner, who doesn't have as much time to manage the territory as he would like. I don't know how he feels, but I'm all for having multiple owners and doing an equity sharing arrangement.
reply
reply
Yah, @Undisciplined and I are on same page. I basically try to operate as if donors are co-owners now, but since its just bleeding money, there isnt actually that much to do/control othet than post cost, and I'm where the buck-stops, and also I don't want the liability of accidentally issuing a security, there is no commitment of sharing a claim to anything.
reply